Search and Find

Book Title

Author/Publisher

Table of Contents

Show eBooks for my device only:

 

A Critique of John Locke and David Humes' Theories of Knowledge

A Critique of John Locke and David Humes' Theories of Knowledge

of: Mbogo Wa Wambui

GRIN Verlag , 2020

ISBN: 9783346187390 , 20 Pages

Format: PDF

Copy protection: DRM

Windows PC,Mac OSX,Windows PC,Mac OSX geeignet für alle DRM-fähigen eReader Apple iPad, Android Tablet PC's

Price: 13,99 EUR



More of the content

A Critique of John Locke and David Humes' Theories of Knowledge


 

Research Paper (undergraduate) from the year 2011 in the subject Philosophy - Philosophy of the 17th and 18th Centuries, grade: A, University of Nairobi, language: English, abstract: British philosophers, John Locke and David Hume, are considered empiricists. This is because they based their philosophies on natural science. Both philosophers contributed to the theory of knowledge with Locke coming up with sensations and reflections and Hume coming up with impressions and ideas as the cornerstones of their theories of knowledge. Their theories aim to show us that everything we understand is by virtue of its connection with experience. Experience, therefore is the source of knowledge for these philosophers. This paper looks into empiricism both as a source and method of knowledge. The approach taken is by mirroring John Locke's theory of knowledge with that of David Hume, identifying similarities, influence of Locke on Hume, the differences between them and a critique on the credibility of empiricism, as one of the sources and methods of knowledge. The conclusion arrived at is that empiricist ideas can explain the physical world and what we know of it but there remains rationally derived knowledge. On this account, both empiricism and rationalism are credible sources and methods of knowledge.